[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.
From: |
Kevin Cosgrove |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged. |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:58:53 -0700 |
On 11 October 2012 at 14:26, Paul Fox <address@hidden> wrote:
> kevin wrote:
> >
> > On 11 October 2012 at 10:35, Joel Uckelman <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > Speaking for myself only: I can't recall a single time in 15 years of
> > > using nmh that I've wanted to use sortm to sort less than a complete
> > > folder.
> >
> > I have two use cases for sortm
> >
> > 1. sortm +folder
> >
> > 2. sortm -textfield subject -limit 0 +folder
> >
>
> does that actually work for you?
The first command sorts by date, which I want. The second command
sorts by subject, which I want. I agree with you that the sub-sort
by date doesn't work. I hadn't noticed that before.
> i like catching up on mail in
> subject thread order. the man page says that "-textfield subject
> -limit 0" should sort in subject-major, date-minor order, which i
> think is what i want -- messages grouped by subject, and by date
> within each subject.
>
> but, in a folder with these messages:
>
> $ scan last:6
> 9891 12:40 Sally Moulton [arlington] Solarize Mass reps speak tonight,
> 9893 12:19 David Levine Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Br
> 9894 12:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> 9899 05:51 "T-Alerts Notific Red Line Braintree Alert
> 9900 14:32 Ralph Corderoy [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Brain-
> 9901 11:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> $ sortm -textfield subject -limit 0 last:6
> $ scan last:6
> 9891 12:40 Sally Moulton [arlington] Solarize Mass reps speak tonight,
> 9893 12:19 David Levine Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Br
> 9894 14:32 Ralph Corderoy [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Brain-
> 9899 05:51 "T-Alerts Notific Red Line Braintree Alert
> 9900 12:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> 9901 11:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
>
> note that ralph's 14:32 message really is earlier than david's 12:19
> reply, due to timezone. the subject ordering is correct, but the date
> ordering is reversed from chronological.
>
> paul
>
> --- somewhat unrelated but quite useful workaround follows ---
>
> the following commands are my workaround:
> sortm
> sortm -textfield subject
>
> i've put the messages back in the original order to start:
>
> $ scan last:6
> 9915 12:40 Sally Moulton [arlington] Solarize Mass reps speak tonight,
> 9916 12:19 David Levine Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Br
> 9917 12:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> 9918 05:51 "T-Alerts Notific Red Line Braintree Alert
> 9919 14:32 Ralph Corderoy [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Brain-
> 9920 11:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> $ sortm last:6
> $ scan last:6
> 9915 05:51 "T-Alerts Notific Red Line Braintree Alert
> 9916 14:32 Ralph Corderoy [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Brain-
> 9917 11:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> 9918 12:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> 9919 12:40 Sally Moulton [arlington] Solarize Mass reps speak tonight,
> 9920 12:19 David Levine Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Br
> $ sortm -textfield subject last:6
> $ scan last:6
> 9915 05:51 "T-Alerts Notific Red Line Braintree Alert
> 9916 14:32 Ralph Corderoy [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Brain-
> 9917 12:19 David Levine Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is
> Br
> 9918 11:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> 9919 12:37 To:address@hidden RSS feeds
> 9920 12:40 Sally Moulton [arlington] Solarize Mass reps speak tonight,
>
> this isn't subject-major, but that's okay for my purposes: having the
> threads sorted in thread commencement order is actually more useful than
> alphabetic.
>
> =---------------------
> paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 51.4 degrees)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
--
Kevin
- [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Ralph Corderoy, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Ken Hornstein, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Joel Uckelman, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., norm, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., rader, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Kevin Cosgrove, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Paul Fox, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.,
Kevin Cosgrove <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Ralph Corderoy, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Paul Fox, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Ralph Corderoy, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Paul Fox, 2012/10/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Ralph Corderoy, 2012/10/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., norm, 2012/10/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., bergman, 2012/10/11
Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged., Paul Fox, 2012/10/11