[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:32:02 +0000 |
Hi,
Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Ken wrote:
> > > What's wrong with QP? Are you advocating for Base64? If so, why?
> >
> > Well, since you're asking ... I'm advocating 8bit. Or really, make
> > the encoding user-selectable.
>
> Oh :-) I don't usually think of 8bit as an 'encoded' form :-)
>
> I would certainly buy in to 8bit as the default for text/*. I can't
> think of any current MTAs that won't handle it, but there should be a
> user configurable override.
Is an override required? It could always try to send 8-bit...
When nmh hands over the email to send using SMTP it would be nice if it
followed
SMTP Service Extension for 8-bit MIME Transport
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6152
perhaps it does, and wanted an EHLO response with 8BITMIME support
before sending any top-bit-set bytes. Maybe it already does this.
Cheers, Ralph.
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/04
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies,
Ralph Corderoy <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/12/06
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 2012/12/05
Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/12/05