[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:44:23 -0500 |
>Thinking a bit more about pick: I'd expect a pick that had
>to decode and translate via an external program on the fly
>would be way too slow. I grep through 10's of 1000's of
>messages at a time. I definitely want the permanent message
>modification.
Yeah, but why would it have to call an external program? We have all
of the bits necessary internally. In a perfect world, I'd like pick
to have enough smarts to search through text/* parts by default (and
to convert to the local character set) when searching.
Not saying you _shouldn't_ do it, but I still think we should make all
of the tools handle MIME parts natively. We're 60-70% the way there on
show, we've basically got repl working, and forw ... well, if you do
forw -mime, it does preserve the MIME content completely.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, Paul Fox, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, Mike O'Dell, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/02/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, David Levine, 2013/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, David Levine, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, David Levine, 2013/02/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, David Levine, 2013/02/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, David Levine, 2013/02/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] message rewrite/fix up, David Levine, 2013/02/09