[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:08:38 +0100 |
Hi Paul,
> as a convenience feature when typing negative offsets, "foo:-n" and
> "foo=-n" can be entered as "foo::n" and "foo==n" respectively.
I dislike this. Must be my preference for Python's `one way to do it'
over Perl's `there must still be one more way we haven't added yet'.
:-) `-' doesn't need Shift and fingers are used to typing it before a
digit or two. I've happily got along with lp:-3 for years without
wishing for a shorter method, and double-tapping the same key isn't
particularly quick, unlike the rollover of `=-'.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers,
Ralph Corderoy <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/17
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, David Levine, 2013/04/18