Re: [Nmh-workers] Conflict between "mime" command and attach

[Jon Steinhart]

Ken Hornstein writes:
> >Gave this a bit more thought.  What *exactly* is the issue?  Is it a lack of
> >confidence that attach will do the *right thing* and the desire to check and
> >change it if desired?
> 
> No, I read it as people are suggesting to solve the mime/attach conflict
> to change attach to appending mhbuild directives to the message body (I
> believe that is bad idea, for reasons enumerated before).
> 
> I will note one thing: I discovered recently that mutt supports an
> "Attach" header, which does exactly what you'd expect it to do.  So there
> is prior art here.
> 
> --Ken

Humph!  Have to check the logs, I thought that I was the prior art.  Humbug.

Jon