Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing

[bergman]

In the message dated: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 18:54:53 -0400,
The pithy ruminations from Ken Hornstein on 
<Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing> were:
=> >    AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Apr 11 2006)
=> >    ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
=> >    Mailer::1.0 [Perl?]
=> >    slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX) [Usenet, I know]
=> >    [Some MTA error reports.]
=> >    XFMail 1.3 [p0] on Linux
=> 
=> So what percentage is that out of all the email you have?  Is there a
=> tapering off by year?

Additional Random Observations Desperately Seeking to Become Data:

        About 0.75% of ~47K messages in selected folders dating back
        to ~1996 have old-style comments in the From: header.

        Most recent: 30 Jul 2012
        
        Peak period: 2005~2007
        
        Notable senders using that format recently (since 2011):
                O'Reilly Media
        
                Randal L. Schwartz
        
Mark

=> --Ken
=> 
=> _______________________________________________
=> Nmh-workers mailing list
=> address@hidden
=> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
=> 
-- 
Mark Bergman    Biker, Rock Climber, Unix mechanic, IATSE #1 Stagehand
'94 Yamaha GTS1000A^2
address@hidden

http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=bergman%40panix.com

I want a newsgroup with a infinite S/N ratio! Now taking CFV on:
rec.motorcycles.stagehands.pet-bird-owners.pinballers.unix-supporters
15+ So Far--Want to join? Check out: http://www.panix.com/~bergman