Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject)

[David Levine]

Ken wrote:

> >> Meh.  Everywhere else nmh presents MIME parts in the order in
> >> which they occur in the message; from what I can tell,
> >> multipart/alternative was reversed just so the display code
> >> would be easier to write.  This seems like a lousy exception.
> >
> >mhlist is a counterexample.  And a good one.
> 
> It's obvious that was done because otherwise, you could never give a
> consistent -part switch (it wouldn't make any sense if mhlist showed
> a part number of 1, but in mhshow it was really 2).

I don't follow, but that doesn't matter.  It makes
sense to me the way it is now, so I don't want it to
change.

David