Re: [Nmh-workers] Stanford disliking my emails -- update + question

[David Levine]

Bob wrote:

> I'm not actually replying directly to Robert's message.  Rather,
> I'm noting that I never received the copy from the mailing list;
> only the one sent directly to me, and after a 33-hour delay
> between Oz and GMail:
>
>      [...]
>      Received: from munnari.OZ.AU (munnari.OZ.AU. [202.29.151.3])
>              by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 
> m6si7752252obh.91.2015.04.24.01.39.10
>              for <address@hidden>
>              (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 
> bits=128/128);
>              Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
>      [...]
>      Received: from perseus.noi.kre.to (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by 
> munnari.OZ.AU with ESMTP
>       id t3MNZIX5024587; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:35:43 +0700 (ICT)
>      Received: from perseus.noi.kre.to (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>       by perseus.noi.kre.to (8.14.7/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t3MNYADA005974;
>       Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:34:10 +0700 (ICT)

I receive my email through GMail, too, and that one was delivered
promptly:

    Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys009amx238.postini.com. [74.125.149.122])
        by mx.google.com with SMTPS id [...]
        Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
    [...]
    Received: from perseus.noi.kre.to (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by munnari.OZ.AU
        with ESMTP id t3MNZIX5024587; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:35:43 +0700 (ICT)

with nearly all of the ~28 minute delay coming from the hop to front
door for the mailing list:

    Received: from [2001:3c8:9009:181::2] (port=61513 helo=munnari.OZ.AU) by
        eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
        id  1Yl4cC-0002HN-VD for address@hidden;
        Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:03:39 -0400

BTW, kre, it added this complaint about Munnari:

    X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
        (bad octet value).
    X-Received-From: 2001:3c8:9009:181::2

> (I did see others' replies to it, that were sent to the mailing
> list, and was waiting to see if I'd ever get a copy.)

Could the messages that you don't receive be getting caught in a
spam trap?  I've had to whitelist some senders and maybe some
intermediates.

David