[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo
From: |
Robert Elz |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:06:32 +0700 |
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:56:00 -0500
From: "John Covici" <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
| Well, that did not work, it kept regenerating the file all over again,
If that's happening, then something is broken on your system. Is the
date set correctly?
| I think my mistake was doing a make clean, but you still might
| want to fix a bug.
OK, so make clean removes dtimep.c (since it can be regenerated from
dtimep.l) - your flex (or lex) generates code that is C99 (has //
comments - for no rational reason at all incidentally, that's insane)
and then nmh compiles with -ansi and no c99 options, so // comments
aren't C.
That combination would do it.
Submit a bug report to whoever supplies the lex (or flex) that your
system uses (wherever the system came from) and complain about the
generation of c99 in what should be a generic C source file.
kre
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, Tom Lane, 2015/11/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, Ken Hornstein, 2015/11/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, Tom Lane, 2015/11/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, Andy Bradford, 2015/11/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, David Levine, 2015/11/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, Ken Hornstein, 2015/11/29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo, David Levine, 2015/11/29
Re: [Nmh-workers] problem compiling nmh 1.6 on linux gentoo,
Robert Elz <=