[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
[Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Sep 2017 09:22:49 -0400 |
okay -- that was silly of me to say i didn't have time.
i have a patch that changes the priority of multiple -prefer switches
to ascending, and also fixes the man pages. i won't push to master
yet, so as not to step on anyone's toes.
but a question: even with this, is there still value in a -noprefer
option, to force the default behavior? my use of -prefer is very
simple (just one -prefer switch, only used by a wrapper script) so i
think i'm not a good judge.
norm -- will the proposed priority order change (which lets -prefer
switches on the command line override those in .mh_profile) solve your
problem?
paul
i wrote:
> ken wrote:
> > >Ken wrote:
> > >> Paul Fox, what say you?
> > >
>
> thanks for mentioning my name. i'd forgotten that i'd had anything
> to do with -prefer. :-)
>
> > >There's also the option of reversing the order, as in my earlier email.
> >
> > I'd be fine with either. But ... adding -noprefer is fine for post-1.7
> > for me. But reversing the order post-1.7 seems wrong to me.
>
> remind me: is -prefer not in 1.6? from your comment, i guess it's not.
>
> we definitely don't want to change the order later.
>
> adding -noprefer would be the simpler change.
>
> that being said, prefer_parts() in mhparse.c goes out of its way to
> run the list of parts backwards, so that the first shall be last, so
> to speak. reversing that loop to run forwards would be trivial.
>
> i think i agree with ralph that the order should be changed -- the MH
> standard is for later options to override prior ones, which i'm sure i
> didn't consider while implementing.
>
> the man pages for mhshow/mhlist do currently give the ordering: "The
> -prefer switch can be used (one or more times, in order of descending
> preference) to let MH know...". it's not in mhstore(1), which refers
> to the other two for more detail. so the man pages must change, and
> should probably also make explicit what happens when -prefer is used
> both in .mh_profile and on the command line.
>
> though this is my "fault", and i'd normally dive right in, i'm afraid
> this isn't the best time for me to take on pre-release changes -- i'm
> a little rusty, git-wise, and don't actually have a lot of time at the
> moment anyway.
>
> paul
> =----------------------
> paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 55.8 degrees)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmh-workers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
>
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 53.2 degrees)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, norm, 2017/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, Ken Hornstein, 2017/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, Ken Hornstein, 2017/09/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The -prefer argument to mhshowsca for versison 1.7, Paul Fox, 2017/09/01
- [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, norm, 2017/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Robert Elz, 2017/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Ralph Corderoy, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, David Levine, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Ken Hornstein, 2017/09/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] multiple -prefer options, Paul Fox, 2017/09/09