[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode
From: |
Conrad Hughes |
Subject: |
[nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Jul 2019 14:43:53 +0100 |
Upgraded to Debian 10/buster and nmh 1.7.1-4 recently: very swish.
Took me a while to pin down a double appearance of the message context
(a legacy mhl.headers MessageName entry, in the end), but while doing
that I noticed that the default (at least under Debian) To: and cc:
lines in mhl.headers are just empty, implicitly not decoding their
content, while the From: line does extra work:
From:formatfield="%(unquote(decode{text}))"
.. now actually I'm seeing unreadable garbage in my To: lines quite
frequently, so adding the same format tweak to To: and cc: seems to make
sense. Any good reason not to do this, or why this isn't the default
for To: and cc: as well as From:?
Conrad
- [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode,
Conrad Hughes <=
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, David Levine, 2019/07/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/13
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/07/14
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, David Levine, 2019/07/14
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/14
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/07/17
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ken Hornstein, 2019/07/17
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Ralph Corderoy, 2019/07/17
- Re: [nmh-workers] To/cc decode or not to/cc decode, Conrad Hughes, 2019/07/17