Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition

nmh-workers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition

From:	Conrad Hughes
Subject:	Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition
Date:	Sat, 26 Sep 2020 00:14:59 +0100

Just saw this for the first time:

  Content-Disposition: =?utf-8?Q?inline?=

.. causing "mhshow: extraneous information in message 126's
Content-Disposition: field (=?utf-8?Q?inline?=)".  As far as I can see
this is a MUST NOT do, but probably not too hard to accept and DTRT.
Thoughts?

Conrad

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Conrad Hughes <=
- Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Ken Hornstein, 2020/09/25
  - Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, David Levine, 2020/09/26
    - Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Ken Hornstein, 2020/09/26
    - Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, David Levine, 2020/09/26
  - Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Ralph Corderoy, 2020/09/26
    - Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Ken Hornstein, 2020/09/26
  - Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Robert Elz, 2020/09/26
- Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition, Valdis Klētnieks, 2020/09/26

Prev by Date: Running Tests in Parallel. (Was: Make test-mhical pass with BSD yacc.)
Next by Date: Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition
Previous by thread: Re: [nmh-commits] [SCM] The nmh Mail Handling System branch, master, updated. 1.7-branchpoint-587-g843bc85
Next by thread: Re: Bogusly RFC2047'd "inline" for Content-Disposition
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread