[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?
|
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
|
Subject: |
Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2023 09:28:20 -0500 |
> > I do not think this is relevant to this discussion, unless they
> > are changing RFC 5322s position on NULs.
>
>But, it seems like a question that IETF could clarify.
I don't see how further clarification is necessary here? I mean, a 16MB
single line in email is clearly a MUST NOT, but people send them anyway.
--Ken
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, (continued)
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Ken Hornstein, 2023/02/20
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Andy Bradford, 2023/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Ken Hornstein, 2023/02/21
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Andy Bradford, 2023/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Ken Hornstein, 2023/02/22
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Andy Bradford, 2023/02/22
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Michael Richardson, 2023/02/23
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, Andy Bradford, 2023/02/21
- Re: (Not-so) hypothetical question: What to do about NULs?, David Levine, 2023/02/21