[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mysterious c0 80
|
From: |
David Levine |
|
Subject: |
Re: mysterious c0 80 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 01 Jan 2024 20:56:14 -0500 |
Michael wrote:
> =======================
> All 101 tests passed
> (19 tests were not run)
> =======================
That's good. Though I'm surprised that 19 tests weren't run. That happens
when nmh isn't configured with some options. 19 seems high to me.
> I tried running "test/post/test-post-basic" manually, and it seemed to just
> install stuff to test/testdir/inst, but I couldn't tell if it actually ran a
> test. Do I need some arguments to the test?
No, the tests don't take arguments. Some require helper programs. To make
sure those are built, it's best to run a single test this way:
make check TESTS=test/post/test-post-basic
If the test succeeds, it exits with 0 status. And that test shouldn't
produce any output if it succeeds.
David
- Re: mysterious c0 80, David Levine, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, David Levine, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Michael Richardson, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80,
David Levine <=
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Michael Richardson, 2024/01/01
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ralph Corderoy, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Michael Richardson, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Michael Richardson, 2024/01/02
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ralph Corderoy, 2024/01/03
- Re: mysterious c0 80, David Levine, 2024/01/03
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ralph Corderoy, 2024/01/04
- Re: mysterious c0 80, Ken Hornstein, 2024/01/04