|
From: | Juan Pablo Carbajal |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #34536] isvector gives wrong answer when checking function_handle |
Date: | Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:44:34 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.23 |
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #34536 (project octave): I see. So accepting Array is an N-d (with N>=2) collection of object that can be indexed. Then docstring of accumarray and arrayfun should be corrected to say they work on "numerical arrays". arrayfun.m: "Execute a function on each element of an array" --> "Execute a function on each element of a numerical array" accumarray.m: "Create an array by accumulating the elements of a vector into the positions defined by their subscripts." --> "Create an numerical array by accumulating the elements of a numerical vector into the positions defined by their subscripts." But I guess "numerical array" is equivalent to "matrix" and "numerical vector" is equivalent to "row matrix" or "column matrix". _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34536> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |