[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #38423] [k:l:m] not compatible for m = -0

[Dan Sebald]

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #38423 (project octave):

And what about this hunk and the last element?  Is that b + i * increment
still?  I'm not sure when this hunk would be called.


   2.188 +  if (num_elem > 1)
   2.189 +    {
   2.190 +      // First element must be the base *exactly* (-0).
   2.191 +      os << b << " ";
   2.192 +      for (octave_idx_type i = 1; i < num_elem-1; i++)
   2.193 +        os << b + i * increment << " ";
   2.194 +    }
   2.195  

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38423>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/