|
| From: | Michael Godfrey |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #41665] 'qt' is default graphics toolkit even when it is not available |
| Date: | Sun, 23 Feb 2014 16:17:28 +0000 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 |
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #41665 (project octave):
OK. I think I get it. The following are documented user
options:
--force-gui
--no-gui
Undocumented and therefore should not be in the code that is
executed by calling octave:
-cli
--no-gui-libs
Should the fact that --no-gui-libs is accepted by octave be reported as a bug?
It is not shown for octave -h, or any
call with bad options.
In any case octave calls octave-gui as the binary. Right?
Is it a good idea that the binary which is run in make check
is not the same as the binary which is installed by make install?
It would be better if make check used the same code that
the user will get after make install.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?41665>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |