[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #42936] set(gca, 'xtick', []) fails to remove ticks [PATCH]

[Rik]

Update of bug #42936 (project octave):

                  Status:               Need Info => Fixed                  
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed                 

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #5:

I modified your patch to use the Octave coding conventions and checked it in
here (http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/1ad621d894ba).

The list of coding conventions is in the pdf manual in Appendix D.  But what I
did was simple

1) Use space between function name and opening parenthesis.  We cuddle the
parenthesis when the operation is indexing and this serves as a nice visual
clue.

2) Use '##' to start stand-alone comments.

3) Use enclosing parentheses around test conditions in if statements as in the
C language.

4) Changed isequal (XXX, []) to just isempty (XXX)

Thanks for the patch and I'm closing the report now.



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42936>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/