|
From: | anonymous |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47387] fracshift function ignores interpolator parameter |
Date: | Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:18:43 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/48.0.2564.116 Safari/537.36 |
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47387> Summary: fracshift function ignores interpolator parameter Project: GNU Octave Submitted by: None Submitted on: Fri 11 Mar 2016 12:18:41 PM UTC Category: Octave Function Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Item Group: Incorrect Result Status: None Assigned to: None Originator Name: Tim Styles Originator Email: address@hidden Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Release: 3.8.1 Operating System: GNU/Linux _______________________________________________________ Details: I'm using the fracshift function in signal-1.2.2/fracshift.m The help indicates that an optional third parameter can be given to specify the interpolator, but using this option has no effect. Looking at the code in frachshift.m, line 46 is checking for a fourth parameter instead of a third parameter. Making the following change in fracshift.m causes the third parameter to be used and it works as I would expect: 46c46 < if (nargin < 4) --- > if (nargin < 3) _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47387> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |