|
From: | Rik |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #47372] Memory leaks and segmentation faults in Octave |
Date: | Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:25:50 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 |
Follow-up Comment #95, bug #47372 (project octave): This bug report is now very long. The memory leaks portion has mostly been dealt with. Do we want to keep it open for the segmentation faults with imread on Windows platforms, or should the discussion move back to the original bug report? Also, the command ./run-octave -f returns immediately to the prompt for me. There doesn't appear to be any segfault, but I can't run a binary built with the AddressSanitizer to check if there are leaks in the GUI. Should I file a separate report for that or continue here? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?47372> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |