|
| From: | Kai Torben Ohlhus |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52425] eigs function regresses |
| Date: | Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:13:38 -0500 (EST) |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/62.0.3202.94 Safari/537.36 |
Follow-up Comment #29, bug #52425 (project octave):
@Rik: The patch (file #42524) lets me go on as before. Thank you for that and
please push that one as well! Most of the FORTRAN checks don't need that
save&restore as they do not really compile any FORTRAN source code.
Just for the files: my prior workaround (comment #26) did not work. Using
"-fdefault-integer-8" within the FFLAGS causes liboctave/external/ranlib (all
FORTRAN) to be compiled with INTEGER == uint64_t and messes up all RNGs that
rely on 32 bit integers... It really raises some doubts about the reliability
of Octave's FORTRAN heritage, but that is for another bug report.
./configure [...] F77_INTEGER_8_FLAG='-fdefault-integer-8' [...] --enable-64
[...] --with-arpack='-larpack_Octave64'
[snip]
checking for dseupd in -larpack_Octave64... yes
checking whether the arpack library works... yes
checking whether the arpack library is free of bugs... yes
[snip]
64-bit array dims and indexing: yes
64-bit BLAS array dims and indexing: yes
[snip]
Summary:
PASS 15943
FAIL 0
XFAIL (expected failure) 5
XFAIL (reported bug) 32
SKIPPED (feature) 37
Yesterday there were unnoticed errors.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52425>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |