[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #52809] interpreter performance is slow on development branch

[Dan Sebald]

Follow-up Comment #14, bug #52809 (project octave):

Yes, cputime is what I prefer.  tic/toc was the original poster's choice.  I
did run the tic/toc numbers a second time to confirm nothing happened system
wise.  Plus there are a lot of cores on this system such that I typically
don't have issues unless some system resource is utilized (as opposed to
simple looping).  I can use cputime() from now on.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?52809>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/