|
| From: | Rik |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #50198] Calling "error" from the GUI thread lead to segfaults |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Jan 2018 01:29:38 -0500 (EST) |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/55.0 |
Update of bug #50198 (project octave):
Status: None => In Progress
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #7:
The exception pointer could be const or not. There are several Stack Overflow
articles on not treating pointer as const and modifying it. See
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8481147/if-you-catch-an-exception-by-reference-can-you-modify-it-and-rethrow#8481171
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30580128/may-i-modify-the-value-of-an-exception-inside-a-stdexception-ptr
I suppose one thing to consider is whether we are happy with the phrase "parse
error" when something goes wrong with printing. Wouldn't it actually be nice
to modify the message to be more accurate?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50198>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |