|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57471] streamtube.m should use surface object rather than patch object |
Date: | Sun, 2 Feb 2020 11:53:56 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:73.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/73.0 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #57471 (project octave): Usually, we try to have one change per commit. So it would have been better if you provided two separate patches for the tube radius and the graphics object type. I pushed your changes here anyway: http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/0cd5f632a4b0 http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/465be7c652f1 Wrt the used algorithm: In general, different results in Matlab and Octave could be considered as a bug. But we have some areas where we try to be "better than Matlab". You seem to have a better background in fluid dynamics: Does one algorithm have an advantage over the other? Would it make sense to support both algorithms? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57471> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |