|
| From: | Markus Mützel |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57471] streamtube.m should use surface object rather than patch object |
| Date: | Sun, 2 Feb 2020 11:53:56 -0500 (EST) |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:73.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/73.0 |
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #57471 (project octave):
Usually, we try to have one change per commit. So it would have been better if
you provided two separate patches for the tube radius and the graphics object
type.
I pushed your changes here anyway:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/0cd5f632a4b0
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/465be7c652f1
Wrt the used algorithm: In general, different results in Matlab and Octave
could be considered as a bug. But we have some areas where we try to be
"better than Matlab".
You seem to have a better background in fluid dynamics: Does one algorithm
have an advantage over the other? Would it make sense to support both
algorithms?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57471>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |