[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #57471] streamtube.m should use surface object rather than patch object

[Markus Mützel]

Follow-up Comment #12, bug #57471 (project octave):

I find it more logical when it comes to preserving file history to first
rename "streamtube" to "ostreamtube" and then add a Matlab compatible
"streamtube" function (see the attached changesets:
"bug57471_ostreamtube_v2.patch" before "bug57471_streamtube_v2.patch").

I was about to push them on default. But would it be OK to push them on
stable? The advantage being that we would have a Matlab compatible version of
the function from the get-go and won't need to deal with compatibility issues
between versions of Octave.

(file #48471, file #48472)
    _______________________________________________________

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: bug57471_ostreamtube_v2.patch  Size:11 KB
   
<https://savannah.gnu.org/file/bug57471_ostreamtube_v2.patch?file_id=48471>

File name: bug57471_streamtube_v2.patch   Size:18 KB
    <https://savannah.gnu.org/file/bug57471_streamtube_v2.patch?file_id=48472>



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57471>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/