[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #58330] Do not warn in ./configure for explicit --without-XXX arguments

[Markus Mützel]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #58330 (project octave):

The no-extras buildbot fails on the compile step since this change:
http://buildbot.octave.org:8010/#/builders/7/builds/1587/steps/5/logs/stdio

I tried with these configure settings (the same as what the buildbot uses plus
the --prefix):

../configure --prefix=${HOME}/usr --disable-docs --disable-fftw-threads
--disable-java --disable-jit --disable-openmp --disable-readline
--without-osmesa --without-amd --without-arpack --without-bz2 --without-camd
--without-ccolamd --without-cholmod --without-colamd --without-curl
--without-cxsparse --without-fftw3 --without-fftw3f --without-fltk
--without-framework-opengl --without-glpk --without-hdf5 --without-klu
--without-sundials-ida --without-sundials_nvecserial --without-magick
--without-opengl --without-openssl --without-portaudio --without-qhull
--without-qrupdate --without-qscintilla --without-qt --without-sndfile
--without-sundials_ida --without-sundials_nvecserial --without-umfpack
--without-x --without-z


Even if "--without-z" is used, HAVE_ZLIB is defined in config.h:

/* Define to 1 if ZLIB is available. */
/* #undef HAVE_Z */

/* Define to 1 if ZLIB is available. */
#define HAVE_ZLIB 1

/* Define to 1 if you have the <zlib.h> header file. */
/* #undef HAVE_ZLIB_H */


I'm not sure why there is HAVE_Z and HAVE_ZLIB (and why one is defined and the
other is not).

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?58330>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/