|
| From: | Markus Mützel |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59076] subplot replaces previously created axes |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:59:54 -0400 (EDT) |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/85.0.4183.83 Safari/537.36 Edg/85.0.564.44 |
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #59076 (project octave):
I haven't tried your change yet. But it looks like it would do what I was
imagining.
I wonder if it would make sense to keep the old logic and add the new logic if
the old one failed.
Also it might be clearer to add an "all" around "size (rcn) == [1 3]" in the
condition.
I haven't tried that yet either. But is it possible that an axes looses its
appdata somehow? IIRC, e.g. "plot" resets about everything in an axes if hold
is "off".
I wonder if there is a reason why Matlab chose to store that information in
the axes' parent instead of in the axes itself.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59076>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |