[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59192] unwind_protect objects should accept lambda expressions

[Markus Mützel]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #59192 (project octave):

@jwe: Thanks for your comments.

I full-heartedly agree on the first point. I didn't realize (or forgot) that
we have `unwind_action`. That looks like the better choice.

Wrt your second point, maybe we could check the code for places where
`unwind_protect` can easily be replaced by `unwind_action`. If it turns out
that we don't need `unwind_protect` anywhere, we could deprecate (or further
discourage) its use.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59192>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/