[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #59192] unwind_protect objects should accept lambda expressions

[John W. Eaton]

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #59192 (project octave):

Agree about eliminating unwind_protect first.  I've been doing that when I
notice it.

I remember now that there may be a few cases where it may be a bit more
difficult to eliminate.  If you are interested, search for the uses of
"curr_fcn_unwind_protect_frame".  If I remember correctly, that is used to
implement the "local" option for various interpreter settings (for warning
state and other internal settings).

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?59192>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/