[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60475] [ocatave forge] (signal) buttap poles
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60475] [ocatave forge] (signal) buttap poles have a different order |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:00:47 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60475>
Summary: [ocatave forge] (signal) buttap poles have a
different order
Project: GNU Octave
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Thu 29 Apr 2021 12:00:45 PM UTC
Category: Octave Forge Package
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Matlab Compatibility
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: 4.2.2
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
https://ewh.ieee.org/r1/ct/sps/PDF/MATLAB/chapter5.pdf
[z, p, k] = buttap(5)
z =
[]
p =
-0.3090 + 0.9511i
-0.3090 - 0.9511i
-0.8090 + 0.5878i
-0.8090 - 0.5878i
-1.0000
k =
1
In Octave
[z, p, k] = buttap(5)
z = [](0x1)
p =
-0.30902 + 0.95106i
-0.80902 + 0.58779i
-1.00000 + 0.00000i
-0.80902 - 0.58779i
-0.30902 - 0.95106i
k = 1
The values are the same for p but the order is different.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?60475>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #60475] [ocatave forge] (signal) buttap poles have a different order,
anonymous <=