[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use inter
From: |
Hartmut |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:31:21 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 |
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #61030 (project octave):
For the (only nice to have) test of the excution speed, you could use
something quite simple like this:
clear
tic
for nloop = 1:100
test bwconncomp
endfor
time_bwconncomp = toc/nloop
tic
for nloop = 1:3
test imreconstruct
endfor
time_imreconstruct = toc/nloop
Running this (probably only) in the current core Octave release version, one
time with the current image package release, and a second time (on the very
same pc) with the "remove jit" patch applied to the image package (and
properly re-compiled) should be enough to be sure that there are no "dramatic"
speed regressions. We could then conclude something like "the speed decrease
in the relevant BISTs is no more than x% with this patch applied." I know that
BISTs are not made for this, but it would be quite easy to do it like this.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61030>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Markus Mützel, 2021/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Markus Mützel, 2021/08/11
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Hartmut, 2021/08/12
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Avinoam Kalma, 2021/08/13
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Avinoam Kalma, 2021/08/14
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Hartmut, 2021/08/16
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Avinoam Kalma, 2021/08/18
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function,
Hartmut <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Avinoam Kalma, 2021/08/22
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Avinoam Kalma, 2021/08/22
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Markus Mützel, 2021/08/22
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Avinoam Kalma, 2021/08/22
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Avinoam Kalma, 2021/08/22
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61030] [octave forge] (image) Don't use internal function, Markus Mützel, 2021/08/23