[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #38063] [octave forge] (optim) expfit name col
From: |
Nicholas Jankowski |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #38063] [octave forge] (optim) expfit name collision with statistics pkg, possible accuracy issues |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Nov 2021 20:19:22 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.69 Safari/537.36 |
Update of bug #38063 (project octave):
Summary: [octave forge] (optim) expfit inaccurate (incorrect)
=> [octave forge] (optim) expfit name collision with statistics pkg, possible
accuracy issues
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #14:
retitling this bug to indicate that the current state of the problem includes
the function needing to be renamed (for matlab compatibility and naming issues
with the function now pushed to the statistics package), as well as general
performance concerns.
I believe the current state needs:
(1) short term - a function rename for the optim version of the function,
and/or (2) a complete rework to implement the matlab 'fit' function that maybe
could borrow some of the code from optim's expfit.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38063>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #38063] [octave forge] (optim) expfit name collision with statistics pkg, possible accuracy issues,
Nicholas Jankowski <=