[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validat
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Nov 2021 06:47:26 -0500 (EST) |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 |
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #61537 (project octave):
This change should allow mxAddField to accept leading underscores:
diff --git a/libinterp/corefcn/mex.cc b/libinterp/corefcn/mex.cc
--- a/libinterp/corefcn/mex.cc
+++ b/libinterp/corefcn/mex.cc
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ valid_key (const char *key)
if (nel > 0)
{
- if (isalpha (key[0]))
+ if (isalpha (key[0]) || key[0] == '_')
{
for (int i = 1; i < nel; i++)
{
but before I commit this change, what are the correct rules for field names
according to Matlab? Do they have to be valid identifiers
([_A-Za-z][_A-Za-z0-9]*) or are more characters allowed? I think Octave
allows any characters now. Should we allow the same for the mex interface?
If we do place restrictions on the field names, then I suppose we should also
check for valid keys in the mxArray_struct::init function.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?61537>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation, Guillaume, 2021/11/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation,
John W. Eaton <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation, Guillaume, 2021/11/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation, John W. Eaton, 2021/11/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation, John W. Eaton, 2021/11/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation, Guillaume, 2021/11/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation, John W. Eaton, 2021/11/24
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #61537] mxAddField too strict on field validation, Guillaume, 2021/11/24