|
| From: | John W. Eaton |
| Subject: | [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #62459] Severe memory leak when functions are nested |
| Date: | Tue, 17 May 2022 12:52:03 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #62459 (project octave):
Subfunctions are completely different from nested functions so any comparison
between them isn't really meaningful for this bug report.
I expect this problem is related to exactly what data needs to be stored when
returning a handle to a nested function (AKA closure in other languages).
There is probably a circular reference that is not being broken when it
should. See also bug #60237 and the changesets I pushed that I thought fixed
it. I may have missed something.
Other nested function bug reports that might be relevant: bug #60845, bug
#60137
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62459>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |