[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] `residue` returns incorrect result in
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] `residue` returns incorrect result in case of pole at zero |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:53:55 -0400 (EDT) |
Update of bug #63937 (project octave):
Status: None => In Progress
Assigned to: None => rik5
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #2:
This is actually two bugs in one. The mpoles function needs to be fixed, but
even with that in place residue also requires changes for the motivating
example in this bug report.
I have modified mpoles.m, but while inspecting the code I found that it is
very old (original check-in in 2007) and there are many improvements that
should be made including using correct indentation, validating the inputs,
having complete BIST tests, matching the variable names in the code to the
documentation, and expanding the documentation to clearly state what the
function does. I've started on that.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?63937>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] `residue` returns incorrect result in case of pole at zero, Michael Asam, 2023/03/17
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] `residue` returns incorrect result in case of pole at zero, Arun Giridhar, 2023/03/17
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] `residue` returns incorrect result in case of pole at zero,
Rik <=
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] residue() returns incorrect result in case of pole at zero, Rik, 2023/03/20
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] mpoles uses relative, not absolute, tolerance for zero poles, Rik, 2023/03/21
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] mpoles uses relative, not absolute, tolerance for zero poles, Michael Asam, 2023/03/21
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #63937] mpoles uses relative, not absolute, tolerance for zero poles, Rik, 2023/03/21