[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 2023 22:29:26 -0400 (EDT) |
URL:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64726>
Summary: Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic)
bug
Group: GNU Octave
Submitter: None
Submitted: Fri 29 Sep 2023 02:29:24 AM UTC
Category: Octave Function
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Other
Status: None
Assigned to: None
Originator Name:
Originator Email:
Open/Closed: Open
Release: 8.3.0
Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: GNU/Linux
Fixed Release: None
Planned Release: None
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 29 Sep 2023 02:29:24 AM UTC By: Anonymous
The betainc function betainc(x,a,b, tail) seems to have a minor cosmetic bug
concerning the aimed parameter input conversion when x is an integer.
## Convert to floating point if necessary
if (isinteger (x))
I = double (x);
endif
if (isinteger (a))
a = double (a);
endif
if (isinteger (b))
b = double (b);
endif
## Initialize output array
I = zeros (size (x), class (x));
The statement I = double(x) does not make much sense as I is overwritten in
all cases a few lines below.
Without spending much time on it:
It appears that the numerical result is still ok. Possible allowed integers (0
<=x <= 1) can only be 0 or 1 and therefore the betainc result is still 0 (when
x=0) or 1 (when x=1).
But moving the initialize section BEFORE the possible conversion and setting x
to double(x) seems a more logical solution, though.
## Initialize output array
I = zeros (size (x), class (x));
## Convert to floating point if necessary
if (isinteger (x))
x = double (x);
endif
if (isinteger (a))
a = double (a);
endif
if (isinteger (b))
b = double (b);
endif
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64726>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug,
anonymous <=
- Message not available
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug, Michele Ginesi, 2023/09/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug, anonymous, 2023/09/29
- Message not available
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug, anonymous, 2023/09/29
- Message not available
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug, Michele Ginesi, 2023/09/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug, anonymous, 2023/09/29
- Message not available
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] Current betainc function has a minor (more cosmetic) bug, Nicholas Jankowski, 2023/09/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] betainc: internal integer input logic can be improved, Nicholas Jankowski, 2023/09/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] betainc: internal integer input logic can be improved, Nicholas Jankowski, 2023/09/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] betainc: internal integer input logic can be improved, Nicholas Jankowski, 2023/09/29
- [Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64726] betainc: internal integer input logic can be improved, Nicholas Jankowski, 2023/09/29