[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #64801] besselj(1, z) is not pure imaginary for pure imaginary inputs

[Nicholas Jankowski]

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #64801 (project octave):

and maybe a follow up - in general how is the precision of complex numbers
handled? are the real and imaginary parts stored in such a way that the two
parts share floating point limits? or are they independently handled. Is this
besselj issue inherent to how octave handles complex values or is it result of
the way the calculation's being done?  (e.g., a vector magnitude calculation
being later deconstructed into components.)


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64801>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/