[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps
From: |
Arun Giridhar |
Subject: |
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps |
Date: |
Tue, 7 May 2024 20:52:35 -0400 (EDT) |
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #65712 (group octave):
The heck?! I was testing with all kinds of inf and nan there and found that
the nint_value was needed to specifically guard against inf so I left it in
place with a comment about what it does. But I tested only with clang for both
branches, not gcc.
Should I backout the changeset so that gcc will build it?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65712>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2024/05/07
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Arun Giridhar, 2024/05/07
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2024/05/07
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Arun Giridhar, 2024/05/07
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2024/05/07
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Arun Giridhar, 2024/05/07
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2024/05/07
[Octave-bug-tracker] [bug #65712] sort over InF dimension coredumps, Arun Giridhar, 2024/05/07