[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.2.x
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: 3.2.x |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Sep 2008 19:23:58 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:13 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 23-Sep-2008, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
> | Anyway, I don't think it's strictly necessary to have all the wanted
> | patches before the initial fork happens, we can just as well fork now
> | (or in near future) and transplant the patches later if they arrive.
>
> What would be the purpose of the new branch if we are not ready for a
> release?
>
So that patches that are not intended for 3.2.x could be applied to
development branch.
> jwe
>
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- Re: 3.2.x, (continued)
- Re: 3.2.x, David Bateman, 2008/09/22
- Re: 3.2.x, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/09/22
- Re: 3.2.x, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/22
- Re: 3.2.x, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/09/23
- Re: 3.2.x, Michael Goffioul, 2008/09/23
- Re: 3.2.x, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/09/23
- Re: 3.2.x, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/23
- Re: 3.2.x, Michael Goffioul, 2008/09/23
- Re: 3.2.x, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/23
- Re: 3.2.x, John W. Eaton, 2008/09/23
- Re: 3.2.x,
Jaroslav Hajek <=