[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"
From: |
Mark Everitt |
Subject: |
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for" |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:49:43 -0700 (PDT) |
I guess what would be really nice is a true implementation of parfor. I'm new
to octave, and it seems rather large and complex. Can someone point me to
where the keywords are actually defined? I get lost in the network of files,
and I have a short attention span...
Maybe I can put some code together for this. No guarantees though; my coding
ability has never been stretched beyond small simulations and I don't have a
lot of free time. But, I have been looking for an open source project to cut
my teeth on, and I can think of no worthier project than Octave.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-Handling-parfor-as-for-tp3841541p3854173.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Ben Abbott, 2011/09/25
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/27
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/09/27
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for",
Mark Everitt <=
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jussi Lehtola, 2011/09/26