[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave on slashdot
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: octave on slashdot |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Dec 2013 08:57:35 -0500 |
On Sat, 2013-12-28 at 15:31 -0800, fgnievinski wrote:
> octave compares unfavorably to other open source alternatives,
As GNU software, Octave is not primarily "open source". It is free
software.
- Jordi G. H.
- gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, John W. Eaton, 2013/12/05
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/12/05
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, Mike Miller, 2013/12/19
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, John W. Eaton, 2013/12/19
- Re: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed, Nir Krakauer, 2013/12/28
- Re: octave on slashdot (was: gui-release branch created; classdef branch merged to default and closed_, fgnievinski, 2013/12/28
- Re: octave on slashdot, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/12/28
- Re: octave on slashdot, Felipe G. Nievinski, 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot, Philip Nienhuis, 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot, fgnievinski, 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: octave on slashdot, c., 2013/12/29
- Re: octave on slashdot, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/12/29