[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #10016] [octave forge] (statistics) mhsample implementation (over from bug #59924)

[anonymous]

Follow-up Comment #17, patch #10016 (project octave):

slicesample in see also should be acceptable now as I implemented it patch
#10019

I don't think axis equal is better, the focus is on the sampling and the
distribution, not the random function I chose to integrate. Axis equal makes
the distribution very flat and does not make it clear the samples are mainly
in the high probability area.

For the first question:
* proprnd must always be given
* One of pdf or logpdf must be given
* One of proppdf or logproppdf must be given unless symmetric is true then
neither need to be given
* The remainder of the inputs are optional but will probably be given due to
the way the sampler works.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?10016>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via Savannah
  https://savannah.gnu.org/