[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Office-commits] r9886 - trunk/campaigns
From: |
sysadmin |
Subject: |
[Office-commits] r9886 - trunk/campaigns |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:20:15 -0400 |
Author: www-data
Date: Thu Oct 1 11:20:15 2009
New Revision: 9886
Log:
web commit by tal82k
Added:
trunk/campaigns/thecaranalogy_bullet_style.mdwn
Added: trunk/campaigns/thecaranalogy_bullet_style.mdwn
==============================================================================
--- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added)
+++ trunk/campaigns/thecaranalogy_bullet_style.mdwn Thu Oct 1 11:20:15
2009 (r9886)
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+What if buying a new car were like using non-free software? While the
following example may seem a little far-fetched, it is a pretty good analogy to
understand the importance of user freedoms in software.
+
+* You would have to pay extra for a key to use the trunk
+
+* Upon opening the door for the first time you would find a paper that said
that you have implicitly agreed to a contract without being able to read it
+
+* There would be an automatic "safety-upgrade" to the car after a while that
would not allow you to go over 55 miles per hour
+
+* If you wanted to have your car fixed, you would have to go to a an
accreditted, licensed repair shop. It would be illegal for anyone else to open
the hood. When you get to your licensed repair shop, they would charge you an
"accredited repair license surcharge."
+
+* When you bring your car in for repair of some funny noise, you would be told
that some of those cars just make that noise. Nothing to repair
+
+While these ideas may seem ridiculous, it is exactly what happens when a
person chooses to use non-free software. You choose the software that best fits
your needs, and sometimes a salesperson will help you out. You agree to a
contract that you probably did not read, or sometimes you even implicitly agree
to the terms by using the software. You use the softare. However, you can only
use the software in ways that the publisher agrees with (driving, in our
analogy). When the software malfunctions, or even when you want to make
something better, there is nowhere to go except to the publisher of the
software. You can not go to a friend who is good with computers. You can not go
to a company to have them fix it for you. You must go to the developer. When
you bring your problem to their attention, they may say, "We can fix that for
you." They may say, "We will think about adding that in our next release." Or
they may (probably) say, "That's a feature of the program, there is nothing to
fix."
+
+Free software, on the other hand, promotes user freedoms. Free software is
defined as: software that you can use for any purpose (driving, paper weight,
art, etc.); software wherein you have the freedom to study it and change it if
you wish with access to the source code (pop the hood and look at what's
inside, repair or modify in any way you see fit); software that can be
redistributed; and software where you can improve the program and release your
improvements (add an active hood scoop and turbo-charger, and put the plans for
doing so on your favorite modding site).
+
+We don't accept infringement on our freedoms when buying a car, so why should
we with software?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Office-commits] r9886 - trunk/campaigns,
sysadmin <=