[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Office-commits] r10044 - trunk/campaigns/pipeline
From: |
sysadmin |
Subject: |
[Office-commits] r10044 - trunk/campaigns/pipeline |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:39:20 -0400 |
Author: www-data
Date: Wed Oct 7 14:39:20 2009
New Revision: 10044
Log:
web commit by holmes
Added:
trunk/campaigns/pipeline/acawikiblogpost.mdwn
Added: trunk/campaigns/pipeline/acawikiblogpost.mdwn
==============================================================================
--- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added)
+++ trunk/campaigns/pipeline/acawikiblogpost.mdwn Wed Oct 7 14:39:20
2009 (r10044)
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# Title
+
+AcaWiki uses free software--and a free software approach--to liberate
scientific research.
+
+# Description
+
+AcaWiki is an ingenious new project to build a body of scientific knowledge
that is free to use, study, improve, and redistribute. Instead of waiting for
journals to make papers more available, they're building a free equivalent that
will be just as useful.
+
+# Body
+
+Even though sharing knowledge is one of the most basic principles of science,
and even though much scientific research is funded by public institutions or
universities, the vast majority of scientific papers end up in inaccessible
troves controlled by private journals. [AcaWiki](http://acawiki.org) is a
brand new project to change that.
+
+From their announcement: "Currently, it can cost up to $35 to download an
academic paper—a significant cost, especially because thorough research on any
topic usually entails downloading many papers. AcaWiki’s approach takes
advantage of the fact that copyright does not apply to ideas, only to the
written expression of those ideas. Scholars can thus post summaries of their or
others’ research online as long as they are not copying verbatim beyond what
fair-use laws permit."
+
+In other words, who needs an expensive journal subscription when you can get
long, meticulously detailed summaries for free? Summaries can be written by
any community member with access to the original article, or by the original
team of researchers themselves. Even if academics face strong incentives or
requirements to publish in private journals, nothing in copyright law prohibits
them from republishing a summary elsewhere.
+
+AcaWiki is built on [Semantic MediaWiki](http://semantic-mediawiki.org/),
which is free software available under the GNU GPL (it's the same software the
FSF uses for [LibrePlanet](http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/Main_Page). But beyond
just using free software, AcaWiki takes a free software approach: rather than
waiting for journals make papers more available, they're organizing a community
of experts to build a free equivalent that will be just as useful to students
and scholars.
+
+If you'd like to be an advocate for AcaWiki in your institution, or help
summarize key papers in your field of expertise, [get
involved](http://acawiki.org).
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Office-commits] r10044 - trunk/campaigns/pipeline,
sysadmin <=