[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Openexr-user] EXR layer naming conventions
From: |
Jim Hourihan |
Subject: |
Re: [Openexr-user] EXR layer naming conventions |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jul 2007 19:03:25 -0700 |
Just to add some more fuel to the fire: has anybody been using EXR to
store stereo data?
If so how? "left" and "right" layers? etc, etc.
My inclination is to write them as:
left.[RGBAZ]
right.[RGBAZ]
and if there are additional layers (e.g.):
left.diffuse.[RGB]
right.diffuse.[RGB]
But it seems like nailing down "left" and "right" (and/or "center")
would be a good idea
along with any accompanying attributes (matrices).
-Jim
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:19 PM, Jim Hourihan wrote:
Hi All, I was wondering how people are using EXR layers. Especially
how the layers are being named and if there are any defacto
standards out there.
For example:
channels: R G B A Z diff.red diff.green diff.blue ...
Where the diff layer has slightly different channel naming
convention than the "default" layer. I assume that some of these
things are a result of matching channel/layer names to shader
parameters. A brief email conversation with Florian produced the
idea that some sort of recommended best practices might established
for layer naming, but I'm wondering if that's even feasible.
I'm also interested in whether people are using EXR to hold stereo
pairs and if so how.
Thanks.
-Jim
_______________________________________________
Openexr-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/openexr-user
- Re: [Openexr-user] EXR layer naming conventions,
Jim Hourihan <=