[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Newbie question about unviewable posts
From: |
Heinrich Müller |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Newbie question about unviewable posts |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:42:04 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 8ea89e0 master) |
Am Thu, 15 Sep 2011 04:29:56 +0000 schrieb Duncan:
> Heinrich Müller posted on Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:52:09 +0000 as excerpted:
>
>> Am Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:38:13 -0700 schrieb Graham Lawrence:
>>
>>> My thanks to Jim Henderson, Duncan and Steven D'Aprano for their
>>> responses. The behavior was as described in Steven D'Aprano's links
>>> re Astraweb, including fragmented trees. I regret I do not remember
>>> the particular groups involved with the exact symptom I described, but
>>> any of the groups beginning msn.forum.science produce no response from
>>> Pan at all except to border the entire top right pane with
>>> ...................... which I assume means Pan cannot access their
>>> headers.
>>
>> Did you notice that there's no References header in this reply?
>> Odd...
>
> It appears to be from a Google webmail account. Doesn't particularly
> surprise me. After all, they can't seem to reliably honor a user
> attempting to permanently turn off HTML for a particular to-address, why
> would they be expected to be much better at reliably getting the
> references headers correct? (Note that I didn't state anything about
> the possibility of the problem being a PEBKAC. I've never used it, so
> can only go on what I frequently see happening to users who have stated
> they've turned it off repeatedly for some list.)
True, true.
Google is fucked up.