[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] how to use additional X-headers for scoring?
From: |
FritzS - gmx |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] how to use additional X-headers for scoring? |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 19:55:30 +0200 |
Am 04.10.2011 um 14:34 schrieb Duncan:
> If the ^.*$ test worked (^ is left anchor, . is any character, * means
> any number of the previous, so together .* means any number of any
> character, $ is end of line, so we have beginning of line/header, any
> number of any character, including no characters at all, end of line, and
> it should thus always match if that header appears at all), try this
> instead (be sure and delete the ^.*$ test tho, or it'll stop on the first
> one it sees due to the =5000 score:
>
> [~xxxxxx]
> Score: =1111
> X-Authenticated-User: \$\$m\$x1dqu63w4useridf
>
> That is without anchors so it should indeed match the desired header
> content, but it might match others that include it, too. But we first
> want to get it working, then try to narrow the scope and make sure it
> keeps working. So assuming that works, now we'll try it with the anchors
> (again, delete the test above first):
>
> [~xxxxxx]
> Score: =2222
> X-Authenticated-User: ^\$\$m\$x1dqu63w4useridf$
>
>
> If that too works, now, again, only after download since we're dealing
> with a non-overview header, then the final bit is to change that score to
> your desired score:
>
> [~xxxxxx]
> Score: -600
> X-Authenticated-User: ^\$\$m\$x1dqu63w4useridf$
>
> One final note. That's a /relative/ -600. So other score matches can
> increase or decrease it. That may or may not be what you want. If you
> want it set to -600, absolute (and to quite processing further relative
> scores), use =-600 instead of just -600.
Duncan,
thank you, this works well now:
[*.*]
Score: -521
X-Authenticated-User: \$\$m\$x1dqu63w4nbpzkjjlef
[*.*] works well as joker for all newsgroups
--
FritzS
address@hidden
Re: [Pan-users] how to use additional X-headers for scoring?, andreas nastke, 2011/10/04