[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Proper behavior of "backup" servers? [DIAGNOSED]
From: |
Heinrich Müller |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Proper behavior of "backup" servers? [DIAGNOSED] |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:27:17 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 7e49a9b address@hidden:judgefudge/pan2.git) |
Am Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:51:18 +0000 schrieb walt:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:29:41 +0000, walt wrote:
>
>> I discovered that setting gmane.org to "backup server" prevents pan from
>> ever asking gmane for articles that I click on in the header pane.
>
> The reason pan was refusing to fetch articles from gmane.org is that I had
> another server set as "primary" AND set to zero connections.
>
> I think pan was waiting for that primary server to ask for the article
> first -- but of course pan couldn't ask the primary server because its
> number of connections was set to zero. Setting that primary server to
> "fallback" allowed pan to query all the other fallback servers, including
> gmane.
>
> This isn't exactly a bug, but the behavior is unexpected. Maybe pan
> should refuse to set a primary server to zero connections? Or at least
> give us a warning?
I'll implement 1 as the minimum for the spinner, good idea.