[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for
From: |
Mailings - Christian Boettger |
Subject: |
RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head) |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:12:25 +0200 |
G'day!
> From: Dave Hall [mailto:address@hidden
> That's probably because I don't trust Kai. Kai has a habit
And he seems not to trust you in turn. How do we get out of this circle?
> Kai (and atm others at probiz) have a habit of running their
> own races.
Just like you perhaps? Or like anybody else from time to time?
In the end, Kai's fixes do help the project.
Calm down, both of you.
> If the project was pbGroupWare that would be fine, we would
> have to live with it. It isn't pbGroupWare, the project will
> never be pbGroupWare, so you need to work as part of the
> team, not run your own race.
OK; if you want probusines to fork out: just say so. Perhaps they consider
it. I would hate it. But:
I'm not setting any probusiness policies with regards to phpGW any more.
It would bring phpGW up into the top list of projects bringing devs to
fork...
> I think a public discussion about the setup changes fips is
> proposing should also be on this list, not via phone calls
> and private email.
You are mixing two things here. Obviously fips should have
announced/discussed his changes before committing.
> It has been less than a week since I posted about the need
> for communication on this list.
... and Kai is the scapegoat now?
> Either work (and communicate) as part of the team, not your
> own little faction that thinks they can do what ever they want.
It is not *MY* "fraction". People still have their own will, even if working
for a company.
AFAIK both fips and powerstat have prepared and submittet their changes in
their spare time, independent of the copmpany (correct me if I'm wrong). If
that should be important.
And now: let's get back to work, shall we?
Regards
Christian aka bofh42
- RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Kai Hofmann, 2005/04/20
- RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head),
Mailings - Christian Boettger <=
- RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Dave Hall, 2005/04/20
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Alfonso Guerra, 2005/04/28
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Maat, 2005/04/28
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Alan Langford, 2005/04/28
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Jim Foster, 2005/04/28
- Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Dave Hall, 2005/04/28
RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Mailings - Christian Boettger, 2005/04/20
RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Mailings - Christian Boettger, 2005/04/29
RE: [Phpgroupware-developers] Communication ... again (was PHPDoc s for head), Mailings - Christian Boettger, 2005/04/29