[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Plash] Sending signals to sandboxed processes
From: |
Mark Seaborn |
Subject: |
Re: [Plash] Sending signals to sandboxed processes |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:23:04 +0000 (GMT) |
Thomas Leonard <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think perhaps I need a sandboxed process polling for a ".killed"
> file, and then killing its whole process group if it finds one. Is
> there an easier way?
A similar approach, but without doing polling, would be to pass a pipe
FD into the sandboxed process, and have it kill the process group when
it receives a message via the pipe.
It depends what you need it for, really. Is it just for killing a
test case that is taking too long, or is it for killing a malicious
process?
Eventually I would like to switch to using a ptrace()-based monitor
rather than doing setuid() for the sandboxed process. That would not
have this problem with sending signals.
Mark
- Re: [Plash] Sending signals to sandboxed processes,
Mark Seaborn <=